Implications of vessel co-option in sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma

Chin J Cancer. 2016 Nov 25;35(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0162-7.

Abstract

The reason why tumors generally have a modest or transient response to antiangiogenic therapy is not well understood. This poses a major challenge for sorafenib treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) where alternate therapies are lacking. We recently published a paper entitled "Co-option of liver vessels and not sprouting angiogenesis drives acquired sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma" in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, providing a potential explanation for this limited benefit. We found that in mice bearing HCCs that had acquired resistance to sorafenib, tumors had switched from using angiogenesis for growth to co-opting the liver vasculature by becoming more invasive. Accumulating evidence suggests that many human tumor types may use vessel co-option, which has profound implications for the use of anti-angiogenic agents for cancer treatment.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Non-angiogenic; Resistance; Sorafenib; Vessel co-option.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antineoplastic Agents / pharmacology
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / blood supply*
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / drug therapy
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / pathology*
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm*
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / blood supply*
  • Liver Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Mice
  • Neovascularization, Pathologic / drug therapy
  • Neovascularization, Pathologic / pathology*
  • Niacinamide / analogs & derivatives*
  • Niacinamide / pharmacology
  • Phenylurea Compounds / pharmacology*
  • Sorafenib

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Phenylurea Compounds
  • Niacinamide
  • Sorafenib