Selecting, Adapting, and Implementing Evidence-based Interventions in Rural Settings: An Analysis of 70 Community Examples

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(4A):181-193. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0179.

Abstract

Objective: This paper explores how communities translate evidence-based and promising health practices to rural contexts.

Methods: A descriptive, qualitative analysis was conducted using data from 70 grantees funded by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy to implement evidence-based health practices in rural settings. Findings were organized using The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation.

Results: Grantees broadly interpreted evidence-based and promising practices, resulting in the implementation of a patchwork of health-related interventions that fell along a spectrum of evidentiary rigor. The cohort faced common challenges translating recognized practices into rural community settings and reported making deliberate modifications to original models as a result.

Conclusion: Opportunities for building a more robust rural health evidence base include investments to incentivize evidence-based programming in rural settings; rural-specific research and theory-building; translation of existing evidence using a rural lens; technical assistance to support rural innovation; and prioritization of evaluation locally.

MeSH terms

  • Evidence-Based Practice*
  • Health Policy*
  • Humans
  • Rural Health Services*
  • Rural Health*
  • Rural Population
  • United States