Comparable Cerebral Oxygenation Patterns in Younger and Older Adults during Dual-Task Walking with Increasing Load

Sarah A Fraser; Olivier Dupuy; Philippe Pouliot; Frédéric Lesage; Louis Bherer

doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00240

Comparable Cerebral Oxygenation Patterns in Younger and Older Adults during Dual-Task Walking with Increasing Load

Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Oct 20:8:240. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00240. eCollection 2016.

Authors

Sarah A Fraser¹, Olivier Dupuy², Philippe Pouliot³, Frédéric Lesage³, Louis Bherer⁴

Affiliations

¹ Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada.
² Laboratory MOVE (EA6314), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Poitiers Poitiers, France.
³ Département de Génie Électrique, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal QC, Canada.
⁴ PERFORM Centre, Concordia UniversityMontréal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine, Institutde Cardiologie de Montréal and University of Montréal, MontrealQC, Canada.

Abstract

The neuroimaging literature on dual-task gait clearly demonstrates increased prefrontal cortex (PFC) involvement when performing a cognitive task while walking. However, findings from direct comparisons of the cerebral oxygenation patterns of younger (YA) and older (OA) adults during dual-task walking are mixed and it is unclear how YA and OA respond to increasing cognitive load (difficulty) while walking. This functional near infra-red (fNIRS) study examined cerebral oxygenation of YA and OA during self-paced dual-task treadmill walking at two different levels of cognitive load (auditory n-back). Changes in accuracy (%) as well as oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin were examined. For the HbO and HbR measures, eight regions of interest (ROIs) were assessed: the anterior and posterior dorsolateral and ventrolateral PFC (aDLPFC, pDLPFC, aVLPFC, pVLPFC) in each hemisphere. Nineteen YA (M = 21.83 years) and 14 OA (M = 66.85 years) walked at a self-selected pace while performing auditory 1-back and 2-back tasks. Walking alone (single motor: SM) and performing the cognitive tasks alone (single cognitive: SC) were compared to dual-task walking (DT = SM + SC). In the behavioural data, participants were more accurate in the lowest level of load (1-back) compared to the highest (2-back; p < 0.001). YA were more accurate than OA overall (p = 0.009), and particularly in the 2-back task (p = 0.048). In the fNIRS data, both younger and older adults had task effects (SM < DT) in specific ROIs for ΔHbO (three YA, one OA) and ΔHbR (seven YA, eight OA). After controlling for walk speed differences, direct comparisons between YA and OA did not reveal significant age differences, but did reveal a difficulty effect in HbO in the left aDLPFC (p = 0.028) and significant task effects (SM < DT) in HbR for six of the eight ROIs. Findings suggest that YA and OA respond similarly to manipulations of cognitive load when walking on a treadmill at a self-selected pace.

Keywords: cognitive aging; cognitive load; dual-task walk; fNIRS.