Investigation of Bioequivalence Between Brand-name and Generic Irinotecan Products

Anticancer Res. 2016 Nov;36(11):5957-5963. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11183.

Abstract

Background/aim: To investigate bioequivalence among generic and brand-name irinotecan products.

Materials and methods: Products of Yakult and Daiichi-Sankyo (brand-name products), Sandoz, Nippon Kayaku, Taiho, and Sawai were compared with respect to their composition and antitumor activity.

Results: High-performance liquid chromatography demonstrated that related substances were within the acceptable range. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay revealed significant differences in cytotoxicity for four cancer cell lines among the products. The concentration of the active compound SN-38 was highest in Yakult's product (23.82 ng/ml) and lowest in Daiichi-Sankyo's product (8.96 ng/ml). MTT assay data were correlated with the SN-38 concentration, suggesting that it influenced differences in cytocidal activity among products. However, the SN-38 concentration was far lower than that of irinotecan (20 mg/ml), suggesting a negligible clinical effect. Metabolism of irinotecan to SN-38 or open-ring forms did not differ significantly among the products.

Conclusion: The generic products showed equivalent efficacy and safety to the brand-name products.

Keywords: Cytotoxicity; bioequivalence; chemotherapy; generic; irinotecan.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / pharmacokinetics*
  • Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives*
  • Camptothecin / pharmacokinetics
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
  • Drugs, Generic / pharmacokinetics*
  • Humans
  • Irinotecan
  • Therapeutic Equivalency

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
  • Drugs, Generic
  • Irinotecan
  • Camptothecin