Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation Circuit Is Not Inferior to Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Meta-Analysis Using the Bayesian Method

Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.067. Epub 2016 Oct 22.

Abstract

The pathophysiologic side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass have already been identified. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation technologies (MiECT) and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) aim to reduce these problems. This meta-analysis provides a comparison of MiECT and OPCABG in randomized and observational studies. A fully probabilistic, Bayesian approach of primary and secondary endpoints was conducted. MiECT does not give inferior results when compared with OPCABG. However, there is a trend to borderline significantly higher blood loss in this group in randomized controlled trials. The question whether MiECT is equivalent to OPCABG can be answered with the affirmative, but long-term follow-up data are needed to detect any advantage over time.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bayes Theorem*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / surgery*
  • Extracorporeal Circulation / methods*
  • Humans
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*