Effect of different aging methods on the mechanical behavior of multi-layered ceramic structures

Dent Mater. 2016 Dec;32(12):1536-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of two aging methods (mechanical cycling and autoclave) on the mechanical behavior of veneer and framework ceramic specimens with different configurations (monolithic, two and three-layers).

Methods: Three ceramics used as framework for fixed dental prostheses (YZ-Vita In-Ceram YZ; IZ-Vita In-Ceram Zirconia; AL-Vita In-Ceram AL) and two veneering porcelains (VM7 and VM9) were studied. Bar-shaped specimens were produced in three different designs: monolithic, two layers (porcelain-framework) and three layers (porcelain-framework-porcelain). Specimens were tested for three-point flexural strength at 1MPa/s in 37°C artificial saliva. Three different experimental conditions were evaluated (n=10): control; mechanical cycling (2Hz, 37°C artificial saliva); and autoclave aging (134°C, 2 bars, 5h). Bi-layered specimens were tested in both conditions: with porcelain or framework ceramic under tension. Fracture surfaces were analyzed using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Student-Newman-Keuls tests.

Results: Only for AL group, mechanical cycling and autoclave aging significantly decreased the flexural strength values in comparison to the control (p<0.01). YZ, AL, VM7 and VM9 monolithic groups showed no strength degradation. For multi-layered specimens, when the porcelain layer was tested in tension (bi and tri-layers), the aging methods evaluated also had no effect on strength (p≥0.05). Total and partial failure modes were identified.

Significance: Mechanical cycling and autoclave aging protocols had no effect on the flexural strength values and failure behavior of YZ and IZ ceramic structures. Yet, AL monolithic structures showed a significant decrease in flexural strength with any of the aging methods.

Keywords: Aging; Ceramic; Mechanical stress.

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Oxide*
  • Ceramics*
  • Dental Porcelain*
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Dental Veneers*
  • Materials Testing
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Surface Properties
  • Zirconium

Substances

  • Dental Porcelain
  • In-Ceram
  • Zirconium
  • Aluminum Oxide