Should We De-escalate the Treatment for HPV-Positive Tumors?

Recent Results Cancer Res. 2017:206:173-181. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43580-0_13.

Abstract

De-escalation or de-intensification of therapy is discussed since many retrospective analyses of former trials demonstrated significantly better outcome for patients suffering from p16/HPV16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (OHNSCC). These observations are comprehensively addressed, but the reader has to keep in mind that none of the currently discussed data result from prospective controlled trials addressing the HPV-discrimination in the primary endpoint design. Identification of the true HPV16-related tumors is still challenging and in addition with different clinical reports and lack of data of prospective trials not mature for routine clinical decision making in 2016. Independent of the currently lacking evidence for HPV-dependent treatment de-escalation, there are some relevant arguments to address this question in ongoing and future trials.

Keywords: De-escalation; De-intensification; Functional outcome; HPV-related treatment stratification; Late toxicity; Quality of life (QoL); Survival; Transoral surgery.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / therapy*
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / virology*
  • Humans
  • Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / virology*
  • Papillomaviridae / pathogenicity*
  • Papillomavirus Infections / therapy*
  • Papillomavirus Infections / virology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies