Reovirus μ1 Protein Affects Infectivity by Altering Virus-Receptor Interactions

J Virol. 2016 Nov 14;90(23):10951-10962. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01843-16. Print 2016 Dec 1.

Abstract

Proteins that form the reovirus outer capsid play an active role in the entry of reovirus into host cells. Among these, the σ1 protein mediates attachment of reovirus particles to host cells via interaction with cell surface glycans or the proteinaceous receptor junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A). The μ1 protein functions to penetrate the host cell membrane to allow delivery of the genome-containing viral core particle into the cytoplasm to initiate viral replication. We demonstrate that a reassortant virus that expresses the M2 gene-encoded μ1 protein derived from prototype strain T3D in an otherwise prototype T1L background (T1L/T3DM2) infects cells more efficiently than parental T1L. Unexpectedly, the enhancement in infectivity of T1L/T3DM2 is due to its capacity to attach to cells more efficiently. We present genetic data implicating the central region of μ1 in altering the cell attachment property of reovirus. Our data indicate that the T3D μ1-mediated enhancement in infectivity of T1L is dependent on the function of σ1 and requires the expression of JAM-A. We also demonstrate that T1L/T3DM2 utilizes JAM-A more efficiently than T1L. These studies revealed a previously unknown relationship between two nonadjacent reovirus outer capsid proteins, σ1 and μ1.

Importance: How reovirus attaches to host cells has been extensively characterized. Attachment of reovirus to host cells is mediated by the σ1 protein, and properties of σ1 influence the capacity of reovirus to target specific host tissues and produce disease. Here, we present new evidence indicating that the cell attachment properties of σ1 are influenced by the nature of μ1, a capsid protein that does not physically interact with σ1. These studies could explain the previously described role for μ1 in influencing reovirus pathogenesis. These studies are also of broader significance because they highlight an example of how genetic reassortment between virus strains could produce phenotypes that are distinct from those of either parent.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Capsid Proteins / genetics
  • Capsid Proteins / physiology*
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules / physiology
  • Cell Line
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions / genetics
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions / physiology
  • Mammalian orthoreovirus 3 / genetics
  • Mammalian orthoreovirus 3 / pathogenicity*
  • Mammalian orthoreovirus 3 / physiology*
  • Mice
  • Orthoreovirus, Mammalian / genetics
  • Orthoreovirus, Mammalian / pathogenicity
  • Orthoreovirus, Mammalian / physiology
  • Receptors, Cell Surface / physiology
  • Receptors, Virus / physiology
  • Reoviridae Infections / etiology
  • Reoviridae Infections / virology
  • Virulence / genetics
  • Virulence / physiology
  • Virus Attachment

Substances

  • Capsid Proteins
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules
  • F11r protein, mouse
  • Receptors, Cell Surface
  • Receptors, Virus
  • mu1 protein, Reovirus
  • reovirus type 3 receptor
  • sigma 1 protein, reovirus