Role of the preoperative usefulness of the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic diseases

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Sep 15;8(9):656-62. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i9.656.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death and has the lowest survival rate of any solid cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA) is currently capable of providing a cytopathological diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies with a higher diagnostic power, with a sensitivity and specificity of 85%-89% and 98%-99%, compared to pancreatic juice cytology (PJC), whose sensitivity and specificity are only 33.3%-93% and 83.3%-100%. However, EUS-FNA is not effective in the cases of carcinoma in situ and minimally invasive carcinoma because both are undetectable by endoscopic ultrasonography, although PJC is able to detect them. As for the frequency of complications such as post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, EUS-FNA is safer than PJC. To diagnose pancreatic cancer appropriately, it is necessary for us to master both procedures so that we can select the best methods of sampling tissues while considering the patient's safety and condition.

Keywords: Cytology; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic juice cytology; Pathology.

Publication types

  • Review