Language acquisition from a biolinguistic perspective

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt B):120-149. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Abstract

This paper describes the biolinguistic approach to language acquisition. We contrast the biolinguistic approach with a usage-based approach. We argue that the biolinguistic approach is superior because it provides more accurate and more extensive generalizations about the properties of human languages, as well as a better account of how children acquire human languages. To distinguish between these accounts, we focus on how child and adult language differ both in sentence production and in sentence understanding. We argue that the observed differences resist explanation using the cognitive mechanisms that are invoked by the usage-based approach. In contrast, the biolinguistic approach explains the qualitative parametric differences between child and adult language. Explaining how child and adult language differ and demonstrating that children perceive unity despite apparent diversity are two of the hallmarks of the biolinguistic approach to language acquisition.

Keywords: Biolinguistics; Continuity Assumption; Language acquisition; Structure-dependence; Unification; Universal Grammar; Usage-based approach.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cognition
  • Humans
  • Language Development*
  • Learning
  • Linguistics*
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Semantics