Changes in Sleep Problems and Psychological Flexibility following Interdisciplinary Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: An Observational Cohort Study

Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt; Whitney Scott; Matthew Howard-Jones; Thaleia Nicolaou; Lance M McCracken

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01326

Changes in Sleep Problems and Psychological Flexibility following Interdisciplinary Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain: An Observational Cohort Study

Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31:7:1326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01326. eCollection 2016.

Authors

Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt¹, Whitney Scott², Matthew Howard-Jones¹, Thaleia Nicolaou², Lance M McCracken³

Affiliations

¹ INPUT Pain Management, Guys and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust Hospitals London, UK.
² Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London London, UK.
³ INPUT Pain Management, Guys and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust HospitalsLondon, UK; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondon, UK.

Abstract

Aims: Cognitive and behavioral treatments (CBT) for sleep problems and chronic pain have shown good results, although these results could improve. More recent developments based on the psychological flexibility model, the model underlying Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may offer a useful addition to traditional CBT. The aim of this study was to examine whether an ACT-based treatment for chronic pain is associated with improved sleep. Secondly, we examined the associations between changes on measures of psychological flexibility and sleep-related outcomes.

Methods: The study used an observational cohort methodology. Participants were 252 patients (73.8% female) attending a 4-week, interdisciplinary, pain management program in London, United Kingdom. Participants completed standard self-report measures of pain and functioning, sleep outcomes, and processes of psychological flexibility. Pre- to post-treatment, and pre-treatment to follow-up measures were examined for statistically significant differences using paired samples t-tests. Secondarily, hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine change in process measures in relation to change in treatment outcome.

Results: Participants showed statistically significant improvements (all p < 0.001) at post-treatment on measures of insomnia severity (d = 0.45), sleep interference (d = 0.61), and sleep efficiency (d = 0.32). Significant improvements in insomnia severity and sleep interference were also observed at 9-month follow up. Small to medium effect sizes were observed across the sleep outcomes. Statistically significant changes were also observed on measures of psychological flexibility, and these improvements were significantly associated with improvements on sleep-related outcomes, independently contributing up to 19% of unique variance.

Conclusion: This study supports the potential usefulness of ACT-based treatments for chronic pain for addressing co-occurring sleep difficulties. Further research is needed to determine how to improve the impact of this treatment for co-morbid pain and sleep difficulties, possibly using a randomized-controlled trial design.

Keywords: acceptance and commitment therapy; chronic pain; insomnia.