Objective Bayesian model selection for Cox regression

Stat Med. 2016 Dec 20;35(29):5376-5390. doi: 10.1002/sim.7089. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

Abstract

There is now a large literature on objective Bayesian model selection in the linear model based on the g-prior. The methodology has been recently extended to generalized linear models using test-based Bayes factors. In this paper, we show that test-based Bayes factors can also be applied to the Cox proportional hazards model. If the goal is to select a single model, then both the maximum a posteriori and the median probability model can be calculated. For clinical prediction of survival, we shrink the model-specific log hazard ratio estimates with subsequent calculation of the Breslow estimate of the cumulative baseline hazard function. A Bayesian model average can also be employed. We illustrate the proposed methodology with the analysis of survival data on primary biliary cirrhosis patients and the development of a clinical prediction model for future cardiovascular events based on data from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort study. Cross-validation is applied to compare the predictive performance with alternative model selection approaches based on Harrell's c-Index, the calibration slope and the integrated Brier score. Finally, a novel application of Bayesian variable selection to optimal conditional prediction via landmarking is described. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: Bayes factor; Cox model; clinical prediction; g-prior; model selection.

MeSH terms

  • Bayes Theorem*
  • Cohort Studies*
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Proportional Hazards Models*
  • Research Design

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.3753198