The specificity of the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test for recreational soccer players is independent of their intermittent running ability

Res Sports Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;24(4):363-374. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1222279. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether or not recreational soccer players (SP) and non-soccer players (non-SP) with similar intermittent-running ability had similar physiological responses to a soccer match-simulation protocol. Twenty-two recreational SP and 19 fitness-matched non-SP participated. Yo-Yo level 1 assessed intermittent-running ability, while the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test served as soccer match-simulation protocol. Heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration [La-] and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded after each bout (1-5, plus an exhaustive task). SP had lower HR after the third, fourth and fifth bout, compared to non-SP. Similarly, SP had lower [La-] after the third, fourth and the fifth bout. SP also had lower RPE after the third, fourth and fifth bout. The appropriateness of intermittent-running ability as the main determinant of physical performance in SP was questioned.

Keywords: Intermittent recovery test level 1; rating of perceived exertion; repeated-sprint ability; shuttle running; soccer match simulation.

MeSH terms

  • Athletic Performance / physiology*
  • Exercise Test / methods*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Matched-Pair Analysis
  • Running / physiology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Soccer / physiology*
  • Young Adult