The marginal fit of E.max Press and E.max CAD lithium disilicate restorations: A critical review

Dent Mater J. 2016 Dec 1;35(6):835-844. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-008. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

Abstract

This critical review aimed to assess the vertical marginal gap that was present when E.max lithium disilicate-based restoration (Press and CAD) are fabricated in-vitro. Published articles reporting vertical marginal gap measurements of in-vitro restorations that had been fabricated from E.Max lithium disilicate were sought with an electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed) and hand search of selected dental journals. The outcomes were reviewed qualitatively. The majority of studies that compared the marginal fit of E.max press and E.max CAD restorations, found that the E.max lithium disilicate restorations fabricated with the press technique had significantly smaller marginal gaps than those fabricated with CAD technique. This research indicates that E.max lithium disilicate restorations fabricated with the press technique have measurably smaller marginal gaps when compared with those fabricated with CAD techniques within in-vitro environments. The marginal gaps achieved by the restorations across all groups were within a clinically acceptable range.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Crowns
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation
  • Dental Porcelain*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Humans
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • lithia disilicate
  • Dental Porcelain