We compared interleukin-6 (IL-6) removal and induction between conventional polysulfone (Con) and TORAYLIGHT NV (NV) dialyzers in hemodialysis patients. Twenty patients on Con with high IL-6 concentrations (2.7-8.5 pg/mL) were randomized to Con or NV group. Dialyzer performance was determined in NV group while patients were on Con and after being switched onto NV. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) response index (ERI) was assessed every 4 months for one year. IL-6 clearance was comparable between Con and NV. IL-6 removal rates were comparable for the first 1 h, but were higher with NV for the entire session (P = 0.03). Before-to-during-dialysis IL-6 concentration ratios were lower with NV on the venous side after the session (P = 0.03). During the one-year study, hemoglobin was lower in Con group than in NV group at month 8 (P = 0.046). ERI decreased in NV and increased in Con group, with a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.002). NV and Con are comparable in removing IL-6 and both induce IL-6. However, the data suggest that NV induces less IL-6, which may reduce the risk of ESA hyporesponsiveness.
Keywords: Biocompatibility; Erythropoiesis stimulating agent; Hemodialysis; Inflammatory cytokine.
© 2016 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.