Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Heart Vessels. 2017 Apr;32(4):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0883-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Abstract

Hypertonic saline with furosemide has been proposed for a long time as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We previously reported the efficacy of continuous infusion of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide in treatment for ADHF. Although this therapeutic strategy can be a useful option for effective decongestion in treatment for ADHF, there is no study that assesses the effect and safety of saline supplementation compared with standard therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion compared with carperitide. We compared clinical outcomes, adverse events, and cost for patients receiving carperitide (carperitide group) with those for patients receiving 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide (salt group) during the initial hospitalization for ADHF. The cost analysis was performed on the basis of the previous report about cost-effectiveness of acute heart failure. A total of 175 ADHF patients received either carperitide (n = 111) or 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion (n = 64) as initial treatment. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (27 ± 19 vs. 25 ± 16 day, p = 0.170) and infusion period (7.2 ± 6.1 vs. 8.4 ± 7.5 day, p = 0.474) between the two groups. The incidence of rehospitalization did not differ at 1 month (7.6 vs. 6.6 %, p = 1.000) and 1 year (36.8 vs. 37.7 %, p = 0.907) between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference for 1 year all-cause mortality between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.724). The single hospitalization cost was 95,314 yen lower and the yearly hospitalization cost 125,628 yen lower in the salt group compared with the carperitide group. Thus, intravenous 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion is as effective as carperitide in terms of clinical outcome and is a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ADHF.

Keywords: Carperitide; Cost analysis; Hypertonic saline; Low-dose furosemide; Salt.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Atrial Natriuretic Factor / administration & dosage*
  • Atrial Natriuretic Factor / economics
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Diuretics / administration & dosage*
  • Diuretics / economics
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Furosemide / administration & dosage*
  • Furosemide / economics
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy*
  • Heart Failure / mortality
  • Hospitalization / economics
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Japan
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Saline Solution, Hypertonic / administration & dosage*
  • Saline Solution, Hypertonic / economics
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Diuretics
  • NPPA protein, human
  • Saline Solution, Hypertonic
  • Furosemide
  • Atrial Natriuretic Factor