Experiences and coping strategies of oncology patients undergoing oral chemotherapy: First steps of a grounded theory study

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Aug:23:106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

Abstract

Purpose: Chemotherapies are increasingly available for oral application. Previous studies have focussed on differences between orally and intravenously administered chemotherapies, mostly following quantitative designs surveying patients' preferences and adherence. The lived experience of patients undergoing oral chemotherapy has been rarely explored. Therefore, this study investigates how patients experience oral chemotherapy.

Method: We conducted open interviews with six patients and two spouses. Recruitment took place in the outpatient clinic of an urban Swiss hospital. Data collection and analysis followed the principles of Straussian grounded theory.

Results: The participants reported physical and emotional reluctance towards oral chemotherapy as well as toxic side effects. Feeling responsible emerged as a core phenomenon. All participants intended to adhere to the therapy although this was challenging because of the complex medication regimen. Belief in the effectiveness of the therapy was a strengthening factor.

Conclusions: All participants reported to be highly adherent to oral chemotherapy. Although they experienced some toxic side effects, they did not react. Monitoring toxicities and support in everyday life should be a core feature of care.

Keywords: Experiences; Grounded theory; Oncology nursing; Oral chemotherapy; Strategies.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Emotions
  • Female
  • Grounded Theory
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Patient Preference
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents