Detailed analysis of error patterns in the number-transcoding task on the Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test

Psychogeriatrics. 2017 May;17(3):164-169. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12207. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

Abstract

Aim: The number-transcoding task on the Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test requires mutual conversion between Arabic and Chinese numerals (e.g. 209 → , 4054 → , → 681, → 2027). During this task, some characteristic errors have been seen among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of this study was to clarify whether the frequency of appearance of error patterns differs between patients with mild and severe AD according to Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores.

Methods: A total of 250 patients with AD were recruited and subsequently categorized into two groups based on CDR scores (mild AD: CDR of 0.5 or 1; severe AD: CDR of 2 or 3). We analyzed 19 qualitative error patterns, including 15 that had been reported to date and 4 previously unreported errors, in each subtest.

Results: The frequency of appearance of two previously reported and four previously unreported errors in the mild and severe AD groups, respectively, were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Characteristic error pattern distributions in number transcoding can be observed in patients with mild and severe AD according to CDR scores and offers useful information for interpreting cognitive screening data.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Chinese numeral; Japanese version of the Rapid Dementia Screening Test (RDST-J); error patterns; number-transcoding task.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Alzheimer Disease / diagnosis
  • Alzheimer Disease / physiopathology*
  • Brain / physiopathology*
  • Cognition / physiology*
  • Dementia / diagnosis
  • Dementia / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Form Perception / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neural Pathways / physiology*
  • Neuropsychological Tests
  • Severity of Illness Index