Laparoscopic treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer with and without uterine manipulator: Our experience and review of literature

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare in a series of 110 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer recurrence rate and surgical outcomes after total laparoscopic (LPS) hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy performed with or without uterine manipulator.

Study design: 110 patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were enrolled in a retrospective study and underwent surgical staging comprised of LPS hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and in all cases we performed systematic bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine manipulator (Group 1, 55 patients) or without (Group 2, 55 patients).

Results: The rate of positive cytology and LVSI did not significantly differ between Group 1 and Group 2. 1 patient of the Group 1 had a bladder injury and another patient of Group 2 had an ureteral stricture temporarily treated with a stent. 1 patient of the Group 1 had a bowel occlusion due to a port site hernia under the left 10 mm port, resolved with a bowel resection and an end-to-end anastomosis. In 1 patient of the Group 1 and 2 patients of Group 2 we observed a vaginal cuff dehiscence and in 1 case of Group 2 a pelvic lymphocyst was reported. Postoperative fever was reported in 3 patients of the Group 1 and in 5 patients of group 2 (p = 0.07).

Conclusions: Our study confirms that use of uterine manipulator for laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer does not increase positive peritoneal citology, LVSI and recurrence rate.

Keywords: Endometrial cancer; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Lymphadenectomy; Manipulation; Manipulator.