Utility of post-procedural anticoagulation after primary PCI for STEMI: insights from a pooled analysis of the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX trials

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Oct;6(7):659-665. doi: 10.1177/2048872616650869. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

Abstract

Background: Many sites routinely continue anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), despite an unclear benefit-risk ratio. We evaluated the impact of this strategy on 30-day outcomes from a pooled patient-level database of two large primary percutaneous coronary intervention trials.

Methods: EUROMAX and HORIZONS-AMI were both multicentre, international randomised trials comparing bivalirudin to heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Outcomes at 30 days were analysed according to the use of post-procedural anticoagulation (unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins or fondaparinux) outside of the catheterisation laboratory.

Results: Among 5239 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 2153 (41.1%) received post-procedural anticoagulation. After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, there were no differences in the 30-day rates of adverse ischaemic events between patients without versus with post-procedural anticoagulation: adjusted odds ratio for major adverse cardiac events 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.07; P=0.14; adjusted odds ratio for stent thrombosis 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.24; P=0.35; adjusted odds ratio for death 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.66; P=0.77. Conversely, protocol-defined major bleeding was decreased without post-procedural anticoagulation: adjusted odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94; P=0.01. Similar results were observed for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major and minor bleeding.

Conclusions: In this large STEMI database, a substantial proportion of primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients received post-procedural anticoagulation, which in turn was associated with higher bleeding rates without any reduction in ischaemic events. Therefore, routine post-procedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention seems to have an unfavourable benefit-risk profile and should be avoided unless a well-established indication is present.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , EUROMAX Identifier NCT01087723; HORIZONS Identifier NCT00433966.

Keywords: Bivalirudin; anticoagulation; bleeding; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antithrombins / administration & dosage
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Thrombosis / diagnosis
  • Coronary Thrombosis / prevention & control*
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Fibrinolytic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Heparin / administration & dosage*
  • Hirudins / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peptide Fragments / administration & dosage*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention*
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Postoperative Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Recombinant Proteins / administration & dosage
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / surgery*
  • Thrombolytic Therapy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antithrombins
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • Hirudins
  • Peptide Fragments
  • Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Heparin
  • bivalirudin

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01087723
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00433966