Use of procalcitonin in clinical oncology: a literature review

New Microbiol. 2016 Jul;39(3):174-180. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

Abstract

The use of procalcitonin (PCT) as an early marker of infectious episodes in cancer patients is still controversial. We performed a MEDLINE search of peer-reviewed articles published between January 1990 and December 2015, and finally we analysed 15 articles. PCT seems to have a good diagnostic value of infectious episodes in cancer patients and its accuracy seems greater if we consider major events, such as bloodstream infections and sepsis. Serial evaluations of this protein seem to be more accurate in the diagnostic phase and useful to predict outcome and response to antibacterial treatment. On the other hand, some issues have yet to be solved, such as the use of a validated method of determination, the definition of a standard cut-off, and the heterogeneity among different settings of patients (e.g. early versus advanced-stage cancer, or haematological versus solid tumours). However, it is credible to think that PCT use in everyday clinical practice, preferably in combination with other clinical or laboratory tests, might be of help in finding and detecting early infectious complications in cancer patients.

Keywords: Biomarkers of infection; Cancer patients; Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Infections; Procalcitonin.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Biomarkers
  • Calcitonin / blood*
  • Calcitonin / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms / blood
  • Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Neutropenia / etiology*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Calcitonin