Diagnostic Performance of Indocyanine Green-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0155597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155597. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic performance of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the presence of metastases in breast cancer remains unclear.

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of ICG-guided SLNB.

Methods: Eligible studies were identified from searches of the databases PubMed and EMBASE up to September 2015. Studies that reported the detection rate of ICG fluorescence-guided SLNB with full axillary lymph node dissection and histological or immunohistochemical examinations were included. A meta-analysis was performed to generate pooled detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and a summary receiver operator characteristic curve (SROC).

Results: Nineteen published studies were included to generate a pooled detection rate, comprising 2594 patients. The pooled detection rate was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.99). Six studies finally met the criteria for meta-analysis, which yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96), specificity 1 (95% CI, 0.97-1), and DOR 311.47 (95% CI, 84.11-1153.39). The area under the SROC was 0.9758. No publication bias was found.

Conclusion: ICG fluorescence-guided SLNB is viable for detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Large-scale randomized multi-center trials are necessary to confirm our results.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / metabolism
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery
  • Coloring Agents / metabolism
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image-Guided Biopsy / methods*
  • Indocyanine Green / metabolism*
  • Sentinel Lymph Node / surgery*
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / methods*

Substances

  • Coloring Agents
  • Indocyanine Green

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.