[Comparison of adaptation of crowns of different lithium disilicate glass-ceramic]

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 May;51(5):296-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2016.05.009.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the adaptation of different lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown and whether different fabrication processes affect the adaptation of crowns.

Methods: Thirty epoxy dies crowns were divided into 3 groups. They were cemented to domestic lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crowns in Group A, to IPS e.max CAD crowns in Group B and to IPS e.max Press crowns in Group C respectively. All crowns were cut by cutting machine. A confocal laser scanning microscope was used to measure the gap between crown tissue surface and die.

Results: There were significant differences in the three groups of measurement points(P<0.05). Within the groups, specimens in group A showed in the lowest marginal fit([46.8±9.1] μm). Those in group B showed the lowest shoulder suitability([59.3±7.9] μm), axial plane([50.5±3.6] μm) and occlusal surface([87.6±11.6 μm]. Those in group C demonstrated the lowest axial plane angle[(84.4±10.1) μm]. In addition to the axial plane angle, the CAD/CAM system exhibited good accuracy of fit.

Conclusions: The three groups of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crowns appeared to have clinically acceptable fit.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Ceramics*
  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Crowns*
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation*
  • Dental Porcelain*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design / methods*
  • Humans
  • Microscopy, Confocal
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • IPS e.max Press
  • lithia disilicate
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Glass ceramics