Financial Benefits of a Hepatopancreaticobiliary Program

Am Surg. 2016 May;82(5):380-5.

Abstract

Financial implications of developing a hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) center have not been considered. We undertook this study to determine hospital income associated with a new HPB center and to gauge the opportunity cost associated with such a center. Operations included were based on the HPB fellowship curriculum and the six most commonly undertaken general surgery operations. The income with "core" HPB operations (n = 93) and the six most frequently undertaken general surgery operations (n = 583) at one hospital from June 2012 to June 2013 were determined. Patients were not screened based on the ability to pay. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Per operation, hospital income with HPB operations and general surgery operations were $15,583.20 ± $45,909.41 and $5,162.22 ± $33,679.10 (P < 0.005), respectively. Accordingly, net incomes of $1,449,238.04 (n = 93) and $3,009,572.78 (n = 583) were observed. Although general surgery operations are ubiquitous, HPB centers are uncommonly pursued at most hospitals, in part due to the patient volumes necessary to meet the expertise required. A "core" HPB operation produces triple the net income of a general surgery operation. Accordingly, significant financial benefit is achievable with the development of an HPB center when adequate volume is realized.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / economics*
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / statistics & numerical data
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Databases, Factual
  • Economics, Hospital / organization & administration*
  • Female
  • Financial Statements*
  • Florida
  • Hepatectomy / economics*
  • Hepatectomy / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospital Costs*
  • Hospital Units / organization & administration
  • Hospitals, High-Volume
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy / economics*
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy / statistics & numerical data
  • Program Evaluation
  • Retrospective Studies