Simulated thought insertion: Influencing the sense of agency using deception and magic

Conscious Cogn. 2016 Jul:43:11-26. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 18.

Abstract

In order to study the feeling of control over decisions, we told 60 participants that a neuroimaging machine could read and influence their thoughts. While inside a mock brain scanner, participants chose arbitrary numbers in two similar tasks. In the Mind-Reading Task, the scanner appeared to guess the participants' numbers; in the Mind-Influencing Task, it appeared to influence their choice of numbers. We predicted that participants would feel less voluntary control over their decisions when they believed that the scanner was influencing their choices. As predicted, participants felt less control and made slower decisions in the Mind-Influencing Task compared to the Mind-Reading Task. A second study replicated these findings. Participants' experience of the ostensible influence varied, with some reporting an unknown source directing them towards specific numbers. This simulated thought insertion paradigm can therefore influence feelings of voluntary control and may help model symptoms of mental disorders.

Keywords: Deception; Magic; Phenomenology; Sense of agency; Thought insertion; Volition.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cognition / physiology*
  • Deception*
  • Decision Making / physiology*
  • Emotions / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Judgment / physiology*
  • Magic / psychology*
  • Students / psychology
  • Universities
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding