Positive Attitudes towards Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in a Swedish Cohort of 1,003 Pregnant Women

PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0156088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156088. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Objective: The clinical utilization of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for identification of fetal aneuploidies is expanding worldwide. The aim of this study was to gain an increased understanding of pregnant women's awareness, attitudes, preferences for risk information and decision-making concerning prenatal examinations with emphasis on NIPT, before its introduction into Swedish healthcare.

Method: Pregnant women were recruited to fill in a questionnaire, including multiple-choice questions and Likert scales, at nine maternity clinics located in different areas of Stockholm, Sweden.

Results: In total, 1,003 women participated in the study (86% consent rate). The vast majority (90.7%) considered examinations aiming to detect fetal abnormalities to be good. Regarding NIPT, 59.8% stated that they had heard about the method previously, yet 74.0% would like to use the test if available. The main factor affecting the women's decision to undergo prenatal chromosomal screening was worry about the baby's health (82.5%), followed by the urge to have as much information as possible about the fetus (54.5%). Most women (79.9%) preferred to receive NIPT information orally.

Conclusion: The overwhelming majority of a cohort of 1,003 pregnant women considered prenatal examinations good. Moreover, the majority had a positive attitude towards NIPT and would like to use the test if available.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Genetic Counseling / psychology
  • Genetic Testing / statistics & numerical data
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / psychology*
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / statistics & numerical data
  • Sweden

Grants and funding

This research was made possible by a grant from Stockholm County Council and supported by the Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, http://www.rj.se/) under grant M13-0260:1. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.