Accuracy of Estimating Step Counts and Intensity Using Accelerometers in Older People With or Without Assistive Devices

J Aging Phys Act. 2017 Jan;25(1):41-50. doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0201. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of uni- and triaxial accelerometers in monitoring step counts and gait intensity in older people who did or did not use an assistive device. Forty-nine healthy and frail older adults wore uniaxial (Lifecorder, Suzuken Co. Ltd.) and triaxial accelerometers (Activity Monitor, Matsushita Electronic Works, Ltd., and Active Style Pro, Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd.) during three trials at different gait speeds. All accelerometers gave relatively accurate step counts for healthy older participants compared with direct observation; however, the error was greater for frail older people with assistive devices. Gait intensity detection error was unaffected by gait speed. Among frail older people with assistive devices, the gait intensity error was smaller than for step count error. To accurately assess the steps walked or the gait intensity among frail older people using assistive devices, more study is needed on these groups of participants.

Keywords: accelerometers; assistive device; frail; gait intensity; older; step counts.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Accelerometry / instrumentation*
  • Aged
  • Basal Metabolism
  • Female
  • Frail Elderly
  • Gait / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Self-Help Devices*
  • Walking Speed / physiology*