Trickle-Down Preferences: Preferential Conformity to High Status Peers in Fashion Choices

PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0153448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153448. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

How much do our choices represent stable inner preferences versus social conformity? We examine conformity and consistency in sartorial choices surrounding a common life event of new norm exposure: relocation. A large-scale dataset of individual purchases of women's shoes (16,236 transactions) across five years and 2,007 women reveals a balance of conformity and consistency, moderated by changes in location socioeconomic status. Women conform to new local norms (i.e., average heel size) when moving to relatively higher status locations, but mostly ignore new local norms when moving to relatively lower status locations. In short, at periods of transition, it is the fashion norms of the rich that trickle down to consumers. These analyses provide the first naturalistic large-scale demonstration of the tension between psychological conformity and consistency, with real decisions in a highly visible context.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Choice Behavior*
  • Commerce
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Psychological
  • Peer Group
  • Shoes
  • Social Behavior*
  • Social Class
  • Social Conformity*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.