A Novel Computational Tool for Mining Real-Life Data: Application in the Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Care Setting

PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154689. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Background: Randomized clinical trials constitute the gold-standard for evaluating new anti-cancer therapies; however, real-life data are key in complementing clinically useful information. We developed a computational tool for real-life data analysis and applied it to the metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) setting. This tool addressed the impact of oncology/non-oncology parameters on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes.

Methods: The developed tool enables extraction of any computerized information including comorbidities and use of drugs (oncological/non-oncological) per individual HMO member. The study in which we evaluated this tool was a retrospective cohort study that included Maccabi Healthcare Services members with mCRC receiving bevacizumab with fluoropyrimidines (FP), FP plus oxaliplatin (FP-O), or FP plus irinotecan (FP-I) in the first-line between 9/2006 and 12/2013.

Results: The analysis included 753 patients of whom 15.4% underwent subsequent metastasectomy (the Surgery group). For the entire cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 20.5 months; in the Surgery group, median duration of bevacizumab-containing therapy (DOT) pre-surgery was 6.1 months; median OS was not reached. In the Non-surgery group, median OS and DOT were 18.7 and 11.4 months, respectively; no significant OS differences were noted between FP-O and FP-I, whereas FP use was associated with shorter OS (12.3 month; p <0.002; notably, these patients were older). Patients who received both FP-O- and FP-I-based regimens achieved numerically longer OS vs. those who received only one of these regimens (22.1 [19.9-24.0] vs. 18.9 [15.5-21.9] months). Among patients assessed for wild-type KRAS and treated with subsequent anti-EGFR agent, OS was 25.4 months and 18.7 months for 124 treated vs. 37 non-treated patients (non-significant). Cox analysis (controlling for age and gender) identified several non-oncology parameters associated with poorer clinical outcomes including concurrent use of diuretics and proton-pump inhibitors.

Conclusions: Our tool provided insights that confirmed/complemented information gained from randomized-clinical trials. Prospective tool implementation is warranted.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Bevacizumab / administration & dosage
  • Camptothecin / administration & dosage
  • Camptothecin / analogs & derivatives
  • Cohort Studies
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Computational Biology
  • Data Mining / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Irinotecan
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organoplatinum Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Pyrimidines / administration & dosage
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Pyrimidines
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Bevacizumab
  • Irinotecan
  • Camptothecin

Grants and funding

The study was supported by IBM Research-Haifa, and Roche Pharmaceuticals (Israel) Ltd (a subsidiary of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd). IBM Research-Haifa had a role in the study design, data analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript. Roche Pharmaceuticals (Israel) Ltd provided the financial support for medical writing assistance. Roche Pharmaceuticals (Israel) Ltd had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.