Objectives: The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) are mandated outcome-measures in many mental-health jurisdictions. When HoNOS are used in different care settings, it is important to assess if setting specific bias exists. This article examines the consistency of HoNOS in a sample of psychiatric patients transitioned from acute inpatient care and community centres.
Setting: A regional mental health service with both acute and community facilities.
Participants: 111 psychiatric patients were transferred from inpatient care to community care from 2012 to 2014. Their HoNOS scores were extracted from a clinical database; Each inpatient-discharge assessment was followed by a community-intake assessment, with the median period between assessments being 4 days (range 0-14). Assessor experience and professional background were recorded.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: The difference of HoNOS at inpatient-discharge and community-intake were assessed with Pearson correlation, Cohen's κ and effect size.
Results: Inpatient-discharge HoNOS was on average lower than community-intake HoNOS. The average HoNOS was 8.05 at discharge (median 7, range 1-22), and 12.16 at intake (median 12, range 1-25), an average increase of 4.11 (SD 6.97). Pearson correlation between two total scores was 0.073 (95% CI -0.095 to 0.238) and Cohen's κ was 0.02 (95% CI -0.02 to 0.06). Differences did not appear to depend on assessor experience or professional background.
Conclusions: Systematic change in the HoNOS occurs at inpatient-to-community transition. Some caution should be exercised in making direct comparisons between inpatient HoNOS and community HoNOS scores.
Keywords: Assessment; HoNOS; MENTAL HEALTH.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/