Prediction of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography and serum carcinoembryonic antigen: a prospective study

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Aug;41(8):1448-55. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0698-7.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the association between (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) parameters, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tumor response in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Methods: Sixty-four patients with T3-4 and/or node-positive rectal cancer receiving nCRT followed by surgery were prospectively studied. PET/CT was performed before, and in 28 patients, both before and after nCRT. The pre-/post-nCRT maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values, differences between pre-/post-nCRT SUVmax (∆SUVmax), response index of SUVmax (RI-SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and CEA were measured. The ability of PET/CT parameters and CEA to predict Mandard's tumor regression grade (TRG) and pathological complete remission (pCR) were evaluated.

Results: 31 patients were identified as responders (TRG 1-2), and 19 exhibited pCR. For responders, significant differences were found for ΔSUVmax (24.88 vs. 15.39 g/ml, p = 0.037), RI-SUVmax (0.76 vs. 0.63, p = 0.025), ΔSUVmean (14.43 vs. 8.65 g/ml, p = 0.029), RI-SUVmean (0.77 vs. 0.63, p = 0.011), CEA-pre (6.30 vs. 27.86 μg/L, p < 0.001), CEA-post (2.22 vs. 5.49 μg/L, p = 0.002), ΔCEA (4.08 vs. 23.13 μg/L, p < 0.001), and RI-CEA (0.25 vs. 0.55, p = 0.002). Differences between pCR and non-pCR patients were noted as RI-SUVmean (0.77 vs. 0.65, p = 0.043), MTV-pre (9.87 vs. 14.62 cm(3), p = 0.045), CEA-pre (5.62 vs. 22.27 μg/L, p = 0.002), CEA-post (1.95 vs. 4.72 μg/L, p = 0.001), and ΔCEA (3.68 vs. 17.99 μg/L, p = 0.013). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that RI-SUVmean exhibited the greatest accuracy in predicting responders, whereas CEA-post and ΔCEA exhibited the greatest accuracy in predicting pCR.

Conclusions: (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and CEA are accurate tools for predicting tumor response to nCRT in rectal cancer.

Keywords: 18F-FDG PET/CT; Carcinoembryonic antigen; Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Pathological complete remission; Rectal cancer; Tumor regression grade.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen / blood*
  • Chemoradiotherapy / methods*
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy / methods*
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography / methods*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Rectal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Rectal Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Rectum / diagnostic imaging
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18