Background: Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a major contributor to mortality. Recently, several studies have reported different results for treatments aimed at reducing the risk of postoperative AF.
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of beta-blockers (BBs) in preventing post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) AF and to compare the efficacies of different BB treatments using a network meta-analytical approach.
Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched (Jan 1995 to May 2014) to identify randomized controlled trials. Two independent investigators separately extracted the data using a seven-point scoring system to assess randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, withdrawals and dropouts. A direct meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trials was conducted. Then, six trials comparing different BB treatments for the prevention of postoperative AF were added to perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis with mixed treatment comparisons.
Results: Treatment with BBs was associated with a significant reduction in the postoperative incidence of AF compared with placebo/control [22.37 % compared with 34.45 %, relative risk (RR) = 0.53, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.75, p < 0.00001].
Conclusions: The network meta-analysis revealed no significant differences among eight types of BB treatments but did provide a ranking. BB treatments could significantly reduce the occurrence of post-CABG AF. Insufficient evidence was available to show that one BB treatment was more effective than the others were. According to our network meta-analysis, bisoprolol and landiolol+bisoprolol are better alternatives compared with the other treatments.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Beta-blockers; CABG; Network meta-analysis.