Financial burden associated with the residency match in neurological surgery

J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):184-190. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS15488. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Application for a residency position in neurosurgery is a highly competitive process. Visiting subinternships and interviews are integral parts of the application process that provide applicants and programs with important information, often influencing rank list decisions. However, the process is an expensive one that places significant financial burden on applicants. In this study, the authors aimed to quantify expenses incurred by 1st-year neurosurgery residents who matched into a neurosurgery residency program in 2014 and uncover potential trends in expenses. METHODS A 10-question survey was distributed in partnership with the Society of Neurological Surgeons to all 1st-year neurosurgery residents in the United States. The survey asked respondents about the number of subinternships, interviews, and second looks (after the interview) attended and the resultant costs, the type of program match, preferences for subinternship interviews, and suggestions for changes they would like to see in the application process. In addition to compiling overall results, also examined were the data for differences in cost when stratifying for region of the medical school or whether the respondent had contact with the program they matched to prior to the interview process (matched to home or subinternship program). RESULTS The survey had a 64.4% response rate. The mean total expenses for all components of the application process were US $10,255, with interview costs comprising the majority of the expenses (69.0%). No difference in number of subinternships, interviews, or second looks attended, or their individual and total costs, was seen for applicants from different regions of the United States. Respondents who matched to their home or subinternship program attended fewer interviews than respondents who had no prior contact with their matched program (13.5 vs 16.4, respectively, p = 0.0023) but incurred the same overall costs (mean $9774 vs $10,566; p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Securing a residency position in neurosurgery is a costly process for applicants. No differences are seen when stratifying by region of medical school attended or contact with a program prior to interviewing. Interview costs comprise the majority of expenses for applicants, and changes to the application process are needed to control costs incurred by applicants.

Keywords: IQR = interquartile range; NRMP = National Resident Matching Program; National Resident Matching Program; SD = standard deviation; SNS = Society of Neurological Surgeons; USMLE = United States Medical Licensing Examination; cost; graduate medical education; interview; match; neurological surgery; questionnaire; residency; survey.

MeSH terms

  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency / economics*
  • Neurosurgeons / economics*
  • Neurosurgeons / education*
  • Neurosurgery / economics*
  • Neurosurgery / education*
  • Schools, Medical
  • Societies, Medical
  • United States