Computational Analysis of the Predicted Evolutionary Conservation of Human Phosphorylation Sites

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0152809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152809. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation is among the most important post-translational modifications. However, few phosphorylation sites have been experimentally identified for most species, making it difficult to determine the degree to which phosphorylation sites are conserved. The goal of this study was to use computational methods to characterize the conservation of human phosphorylation sites in a wide variety of eukaryotes. Using experimentally-determined human sites as input, homologous phosphorylation sites were predicted in all 432 eukaryotes for which complete proteomes were available. For each pair of species, we calculated phosphorylation site conservation as the number of phosphorylation sites found in both species divided by the number found in at least one of the two species. A clustering of the species based on this conservation measure was concordant with phylogenies based on traditional genomic measures. For a subset of the 432 species, phosphorylation site conservation was compared to conservation of both protein kinases and proteins in general. Protein kinases exhibited the highest degree of conservation, while general proteins were less conserved and phosphorylation sites were least conserved. Although preliminary, these data tentatively suggest that variation in phosphorylation sites may play a larger role in explaining phenotypic differences among organisms than differences in the complements of protein kinases or general proteins.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amino Acid Sequence
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Molecular Sequence Data
  • Phosphorylation
  • Protein Kinases / chemistry
  • Protein Kinases / metabolism

Substances

  • Protein Kinases

Grants and funding

Funding was provided by Genome Canada (http://www.genomecanada.ca). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.