[Association between Service Utilization Patterns and Frailty in the Elderly Certified at the Support Level in the Long-term Care Insurance System]

Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2016;63(3):135-42. doi: 10.11236/jph.63.3_135.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

Objectives: This cross-sectional study clarified the association between service utilization patterns and frailty in the elderly certified at the support level in Japan's long-term care insurance (LTCI) system.

Methods: We analyzed 710 subjects who completed in-home assessments and interviews from 1,033 elderly aged 65 and over living in Izumiotsu who had been certified at the LTCI support level in August 2014. The long-term service utilization data were collected from the local governmental office. Frailty was examined by the in-home structured assessment conducted by local health and welfare professionals. As frailty indicators, we measured subjects' frailty using the Kaigo-Yobo-Checklist (CL frailty), handgrip strength, body mass index, depression, and cognitive function. Long-term service utilization patterns were classified into five patterns: (1) home helper service only, (2) day care service only, (3) home helper and day care service, (4) one or more other services (using at least one other service regardless of home helper or day care), and (5) no service utilization. Odds ratios (ORs) of each frailty indicator were estimated by service utilization patterns by using logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic characteristics, with the other services group as the reference category.

Results: Out of 710 subjects (100%), the proportions of the service utilization patterns were as follows: home helper service only, 17.9%; day care service only, 15.6%; home helper and day care service, 13.1%; one or more other services, 27.0%; and no service utilization, 26.3%. The logistic regression analyses showed that compared with the one or more other services group, the day care service only group had lower odds of CL frailty (OR=0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.34 to 0.95) and lower odds of low handgrip strength (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.35 to 1.00). The no service utilization group had lower odds of CL frailty (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.32 to 0.79) and lower odds of low handgrip strength (OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.37 to 0.91). The home helper service only group had higher odds of low handgrip strength (OR=1.91, 95% CI=1.11 to 3.29).

Conclusion: Long-term service utilization patterns of the elderly certified at the support level in the LTCI system were associated with frailty. Classifying frailty characteristics by long-term service utilization patterns may be considered as a method to provide community-based resources and support for older adults in the community.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Frail Elderly
  • Hand Strength
  • Home Care Services / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Long-Term Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Male