Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: Is More Chemotherapy Better?

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):21. doi: 10.1007/s11864-016-0395-3.

Abstract

Two cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine (CF) and 6 cycles of perioperative CF with or without epirubicin are an evidence-based approach in operable esophageal and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinomas. Three-drug regimens with anthracycline or taxane are associated with significantly higher tumor regression rates, with an expected increase in toxicity. In order to achieve an R0 resection and consequently a survival advantage, in selected patients having a risk of a threatened margin or incomplete resection, chemotherapy might be continued beyond 2 cycles if a response has been demonstrated. In metastatic setting, multidrug combination regimens have demonstrated a significant survival benefit when compared to single-agent regimes. A three-drug regimen should be considered for fit patients and/or when a response is required for symptom control. The expected increase in toxicity needs to be carefully considered and discussed with patients. The choice to use a taxane in first-line setting may limit the options of second-line treatment to irinotecan-containing regimens and also precludes the use of anthracyclines in the first line. For this reason, we prefer to reserve taxane-based therapy for the second-line setting.

Keywords: Chemoradiation; Chemotherapy; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Esophagogastric junction; Gastric adenocarcinoma; Neoadjuvant; Perioperative; Targeted agents; Treatment approach.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / drug therapy*
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Esophagogastric Junction / pathology
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents