Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0150899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150899. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Private gardens provide habitat and resources for many birds living in human-dominated landscapes. While wild bird feeding is recognised as one of the most popular forms of human-wildlife interaction, almost nothing is known about the use of bird baths. This citizen science initiative explores avian assemblages at bird baths in private gardens in south-eastern Australia and how this differs with respect to levels of urbanisation and bioregion. Overall, 992 citizen scientists collected data over two, four-week survey periods during winter 2014 and summer 2015 (43% participated in both years). Avian assemblages at urban and rural bird baths differed between bioregions with aggressive nectar-eating species influenced the avian assemblages visiting urban bird baths in South Eastern Queensland, NSW North Coast and Sydney Basin while introduced birds contributed to differences in South Western Slopes, Southern Volcanic Plains and Victorian Midlands. Small honeyeaters and other small native birds occurred less often at urban bird baths compared to rural bird baths. Our results suggest that differences between urban versus rural areas, as well as bioregion, significantly influence the composition of avian assemblages visiting bird baths in private gardens. We also demonstrate that citizen science monitoring of fixed survey sites such as bird baths is a useful tool in understanding large-scale patterns in avian assemblages which requires a vast amount of data to be collected across broad areas.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Australia
  • Behavior, Animal / physiology*
  • Birds / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Social Planning*
  • Urban Renewal*

Grants and funding

Gráinne P Cleary was funded by National Parks Association of NSW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Co-author Bill R. Coleman is employed by Evolve Information Services. This author's contribution to the research and the writing of this paper was done in his own time and he did not work on the research or paper during the hours he was working for Evolve. Evolve Information Services provided support in the form of salary for author Coleman, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific role of this author is articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.