Background/purpose: Calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) are used for inducing a calcific barrier at an open tooth root (apexification). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of calcium hydroxide and MTA for apexification of immature permanent teeth.
Methods: Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched until November 24, 2015, using the keywords apexification, permanent teeth, MTA, and calcium hydroxide.
Results: Of 216 studies identified, four studies were included. There were no differences in the clinical success rate [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 3.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-21.72, p = 0.271], radiographic success rate (pooled OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 0.45-41.36, p = 0.206), or apical barrier formation rate (pooled OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.59-4.96, p = 0.322) between calcium hydroxide and MTA groups. The time required for apical barrier formation was significantly less in the MTA group (pooled difference in means = -3.58, 95% CI: from -4.91 to -2.25, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: While both materials provide similar success rates, the shorter treatment time with MTA may translate into higher overall success rates because of better patient compliance.
Keywords: apexification; calcium hydroxide; immature teeth; mineral trioxide aggregate.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.