Abstract
By proposing a moratorium on human germ line editing using CRISPR, scientists have entered an all‐or‐nothing wager with public opinion. A better approach would be to convene a rational and broad discussion of the fair and ethical application and regulation of gene editing and other new technologies.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
CRISPR-Cas Systems
-
Gene Targeting / adverse effects
-
Gene Targeting / ethics*
-
Gene Targeting / methods
-
Genetic Engineering / adverse effects
-
Genetic Engineering / ethics*
-
Genetic Engineering / legislation & jurisprudence
-
Public Opinion*