Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0148610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148610. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Background context: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and human cervical spines has not been reported.

Purpose: To compare fundamental structural similarities and differences in vertebral bodies from the cervical spines of commonly used experimental animal models and humans.

Study design: Anatomical morphometric analysis was performed on cervical vertebra specimens harvested from humans and two common large animals (i.e., calves and pigs).

Methods: Multiple morphometric parameters were directly measured from cervical spine specimens of twelve pigs, twelve calves and twelve human adult cadavers. The following anatomical parameters were measured: vertebral body width (VBW), vertebral body depth (VBD), vertebral body height (VBH), spinal canal width (SCW), spinal canal depth (SCD), pedicle width (PW), pedicle depth (PD), pedicle inclination (PI), dens width (DW), dens depth (DD), total vertebral width (TVW), and total vertebral depth (TVD).

Results: The atlantoaxial (C1-2) joint in pigs is similar to that in humans and could serve as a human substitute. The pig cervical spine is highly similar to the human cervical spine, except for two large transverse processes in the anterior regions ofC4-C6. The width and depth of the calf odontoid process were larger than those in humans. VBW and VBD of calf cervical vertebrae were larger than those in humans, but the spinal canal was smaller. Calf C7 was relatively similar to human C7, thus, it may be a good substitute.

Conclusion: Pig cervical vertebrae were more suitable human substitutions than calf cervical vertebrae, especially with respect to C1, C2, and C7. The biomechanical properties of nerve vascular anatomy and various segment functions in pig and calf cervical vertebrae must be considered when selecting an animal model for research on the spine.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Cadaver
  • Cattle
  • Cervical Vertebrae / anatomy & histology*
  • Humans
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Models, Animal
  • Spinal Canal / anatomy & histology
  • Spine / anatomy & histology
  • Sus scrofa

Grants and funding

This work is supported by grants from Qianjiang Talents Project of Technology Office of Zhejiang Province (Grant No: 2010R10075), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No: LR12H06001), The project of Science and Technology Bureau of Wenzhou city (Grant No: Y20100091) and National Nature Foundation of China (Grant No. 81371988).