Consensus and controversies in the definition, assessment, treatment and monitoring of BTcP: results of a Delphi study

Clin Transl Oncol. 2016 Nov;18(11):1088-1097. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1490-4.

Abstract

Introduction: There is no unanimous consensus on the clinical features to define breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). The current project aimed to investigate the opinion of a panel of experts on cancer pain on how to define, diagnose, assess, treat and monitor BTcP.

Materials and methods: A two-round Spanish multi-centre exploratory Delphi study was conducted with medical experts (n = 90) previously selected from Medical Oncology Services, Radiation Oncology, Palliative Care/Home Care Teams, and Pain Units. The study intended to seek experts' consensus and to define a set of recommendations for the management of BTcP.

Results: It was generally agreed that, definition of BTcP implies that baseline pain should be controlled (84 %), although not necessarily with opioids (only 30 %); there must be exacerbations (98.9 %); the duration of each episode should last <1 h (70 %); the intensity of pain ≥7 out of 10 (67.8 %); and the number of flares per day should not be less than four. All participants supported the use of the Davies algorithm for the diagnosis. The use of a 'Patient Diary' was highly recommended. The optimal treatment should have a rapid onset, a short-acting analgesic effect (1-2 h) and transmucosal nasal or oral administration. It was considered very important to develop protocols for the management of cancer pain.

Conclusions: The present Delphi study identified a set of recommendations to define, assess and monitor BTcP.

Keywords: Baseline cancer pain; Breakthrough cancer pain; Cancer; Consensus; Delphi; Management.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Breakthrough Pain / diagnosis*
  • Breakthrough Pain / therapy*
  • Cancer Pain / diagnosis*
  • Cancer Pain / therapy*
  • Consensus
  • Delphi Technique
  • Pain Management / methods