Gastric Band Removal in Revisional Bariatric Surgery, One-Step Versus Two-Step: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Obes Surg. 2016 Apr;26(4):866-73. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2082-7.

Abstract

We aimed to systematically review the literature comparing the safety of one-step versus two-step revisional bariatric surgery from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). There is debate on the safety of removing the gastric band and performing revisional surgery immediately or in a delayed, two-step fashion due to potential higher complications in one-step revisions. A systematic and comprehensive search of the literature was conducted. Included studies directly compared one-step and two-step revisional surgery. Eleven studies were included with 1370 patients. Meta-analysis found comparable rates of complications, morbidity, and mortality between one-step and two-step revisions for both RYGB and SG groups. This suggests that immediate or delayed revisional bariatric surgeries are both safe options for LAGB revisions.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Gastric band; Gastric bypass; Laparoscopic; Minimally invasive; Revision; Sleeve gastrectomy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Device Removal
  • Gastrectomy
  • Gastric Bypass
  • Gastroplasty*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy
  • Obesity, Morbid / surgery*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Weight Loss