Facilitating or getting in the way? The effect of clinicians' knowledge, values and beliefs on referral and participation

Robyn Gallagher; Lis Neubeck; Huiyun Du; Carolyn Astley; Narelle M Berry; Martha N Hill; Robyn Clark

doi:10.1177/2047487316630085

Facilitating or getting in the way? The effect of clinicians' knowledge, values and beliefs on referral and participation

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):1141-50. doi: 10.1177/2047487316630085. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Authors

Robyn Gallagher¹, Lis Neubeck², Huiyun Du³, Carolyn Astley⁴, Narelle M Berry³, Martha N Hill⁵, Robyn Clark⁶

Affiliations

¹ Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Australia Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia robyn.gallagher@sydney.edu.au.
² Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Australia.
³ School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Australia.
⁴ Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Australia Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Heart Foundation SA, Flinders University, Australia.
⁵ School of Nursing, The Johns Hopkins University, USA.
⁶ Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Australia Sansom Institute, University of South Australia, Australia South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Australia.

PMID: 26830147
DOI: 10.1177/2047487316630085

Abstract

Background: Despite the compelling evidence of the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on risk factor modification, quality of life and mortality reduction, a significant proportion of eligible patients are not referred or do not participate. Factors influencing CR referral and participation are complex and are likely patient, referral system and clinician-related. Little is known about clinician-related factors, which include attitudes, values and beliefs towards CR, or how these factors affect patient referral and attendance. This review examines the current evidence in the literature in relation to clinicians' attitudes, values and beliefs about CR.

Methods: A review of the literature was conducted on studies in relation to clinicians' attitudes, values and beliefs toward CR. An expert consensus methodology was used to develop the concepts presented in this paper.

Results: Besides guidelines, a range of other factors influence clinicians' view about CR. This review suggests that clinicians lacking cardiac qualifications may have limited knowledge and awareness of CR and its benefits. Low agreement among clinicians on who is more likely to benefit from CR was also identified. Clinicians' personal lifestyle and health belief, the availability and quality of local the CR programme, and the lack of a standard administrative process of referral can also hinder the referral of patients to CR.

Conclusions: Clinician-related factors are important to consider in relation to CR referral and participation. Education for clinicians, discussion of local services and the support of an efficacious system at programme and organisation levels are essential.

Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; clinician attitudes; participation barriers; recruitment; referral; secondary prevention.

Publication types

Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Attitude of Health Personnel
Cardiac Rehabilitation / standards*
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
Humans
Patient Participation*
Referral and Consultation / standards*
Surveys and Questionnaires