Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Battery Life: Opportunities for Risk (Re)-Stratification in ICD Recipients

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 2;67(4):435-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.033.

Abstract

Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are frequently viewed as a lifelong commitment in that patients are routinely scheduled for generator exchange (GE) at end of battery life, several considerations should prompt a reevaluation of risks and benefits before GE. Compared with initial ICD implant, patients receiving replacement devices are older, and have more comorbidities and shorter life expectancy, all of which may limit the benefit of ICD therapy following GE. Additionally, GE is associated with significant complications, including infection, which may increase the risk of mortality. In this paper, we review recent data regarding opportunities for risk stratification before GE, with a particular focus on those with improved left ventricular function and those who have not experienced ICD therapies during the first battery life. We also provide a broader perspective on ICD therapy, focusing on how decisions regarding GE may affect goals of care at the end of life.

Keywords: cardiac arrhythmias; generator exchange; heart failure; risk assessment; sudden cardiac death; ventricular function.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cause of Death / trends
  • Death, Sudden, Cardiac / epidemiology
  • Death, Sudden, Cardiac / etiology*
  • Defibrillators, Implantable / adverse effects*
  • Equipment Failure
  • Global Health
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate / trends