Quantitative Genetics Identifies Cryptic Genetic Variation Involved in the Paternal Regulation of Seed Development

PLoS Genet. 2016 Jan 26;12(1):e1005806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005806. eCollection 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Embryonic development requires a correct balancing of maternal and paternal genetic information. This balance is mediated by genomic imprinting, an epigenetic mechanism that leads to parent-of-origin-dependent gene expression. The parental conflict (or kinship) theory proposes that imprinting can evolve due to a conflict between maternal and paternal alleles over resource allocation during seed development. One assumption of this theory is that paternal alleles can regulate seed growth; however, paternal effects on seed size are often very low or non-existent. We demonstrate that there is a pool of cryptic genetic variation in the paternal control of Arabidopsis thaliana seed development. Such cryptic variation can be exposed in seeds that maternally inherit a medea mutation, suggesting that MEA acts as a maternal buffer of paternal effects. Genetic mapping using recombinant inbred lines, and a novel method for the mapping of parent-of-origin effects using whole-genome sequencing of segregant bulks, indicate that there are at least six loci with small, paternal effects on seed development. Together, our analyses reveal the existence of a pool of hidden genetic variation on the paternal control of seed development that is likely shaped by parental conflict.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Alleles
  • Arabidopsis / genetics*
  • Arabidopsis / growth & development
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
  • Genetic Variation*
  • Genome, Plant
  • Genomic Imprinting*
  • Models, Genetic
  • Plant Development / genetics
  • Seeds / genetics*
  • Seeds / growth & development

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the University of Zürich, a long-term postdoctoral fellowship from EMBO (http://www.embo.org/) to MB, and grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (www.snf.ch) and the European Research Council (http://erc.europa.eu) to UG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.