Monitoring postnatal growth of preterm infants: present and future

Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;103(2):635S-47S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.106310. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus with regard to which charts are most suitable for monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants.

Objective: We aimed to assess the strategies used to develop existing postnatal growth charts for preterm infants and their methodologic quality.

Design: A systematic review of observational longitudinal studies, having as their primary objective the creation of postnatal growth charts for preterm infants, was conducted. Thirty-eight items distributed in 3 methodologic domains ("study design," "statistical methods," and "reporting methods") were assessed in each study. Each item was scored as a "low" or "high" risk of bias. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data. A total quality score [(number of "low risk" of bias marks/total number of items assessed) × 100%] was calculated for each study. Median (range, IQR) quality scores for each methodologic domain and for all included studies were computed.

Results: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (44.3%) of the 61 studies scored ≥50%, of which 10 scored >60% and only 1 scored >66%. The median (range, IQR) quality score for the 61 included studies was 47% (26-75%, 34-56%). The scores for the domains study design, statistical methods, and reporting methods were 44% (19-67%, 33-52%), 25% (0-88%, 13-38%), and 33% (0-100%, 0-33%), respectively. The most common shortcomings were observed in items related to anthropometric measures (the main variable of interest), gestational age estimation, follow-up duration, reporting of postnatal care and morbidities, assessment of outliers, covariates, and chart presentation.

Conclusions: The overall methodologic quality of existing longitudinal studies was fair to low. To overcome these problems, the Preterm Postnatal Follow-up Study, 1 of the 3 main components of The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century Project, was designed to construct preterm postnatal growth standards from a prospective cohort of "healthy" pregnancies and preterm newborns without evidence of fetal growth restriction.

Keywords: growth charts; perinatal outcomes; phenotypes; postnatal growth; preterm birth; syndrome; systematic review.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Child Development*
  • Female
  • Fetal Growth Retardation / diagnosis
  • Fetal Growth Retardation / prevention & control*
  • Growth Charts
  • Growth Disorders / diagnosis
  • Growth Disorders / etiology
  • Growth Disorders / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena*
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Precision Medicine*
  • Pregnancy
  • Premature Birth / diet therapy*
  • Premature Birth / physiopathology
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal