Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review

Pediatr Res. 2016 May;79(5):676-83. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.279. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

Abstract

Meaningful child participation in medical research is seen as important. In order to facilitate further development of participatory research, we performed a systematic literature study to describe and assess the available knowledge on participatory methods in pediatric research. A search was executed in five databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane. After careful screening of relevant papers, finally 24 documents were included in our analysis. Literature on participatory methods in pediatric research appears generally to be descriptive, whereby high-quality evidence is lacking. Overall, five groups of participatory methods for children could be distinguished: observational, verbal, written, visual, and active methods. The choice for one of these methods should be based on the child's age, on social and demographic characteristics, and on the research objectives. To date, these methods are still solely used for obtaining data, yet they are suitable for conducting meaningful participation. This may result in a successful partnership between children and researchers. Researchers conducting participatory research with children can use this systematic review in order to weigh the current knowledge about the participatory methods presented.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Biomedical Research / methods*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Communication
  • Humans
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Participation*
  • Pediatrics / methods*
  • Research Design