Coronal pulpotomy for cariously exposed permanent posterior teeth with closed apices: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hend Alqaderi; Chun-Teh Lee; Sary Borzangy; Tom C Pagonis

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.12.005

Coronal pulpotomy for cariously exposed permanent posterior teeth with closed apices: A systematic review and meta-analysis

J Dent. 2016 Jan:44:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

Authors

Hend Alqaderi¹, Chun-Teh Lee², Sary Borzangy³, Tom C Pagonis⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: hend_alqaderi@hsdm.harvard.edu.
² Department of Applied Oral Sciences, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: roclee520@gmail.com.
³ Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: sborzangy@gmail.com.
⁴ Division of Endodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: tom_pagonis@hsdm.harvard.edu.

PMID: 26687672
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.12.005

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review was performed to evaluate the clinical outcome of coronal pulpotomy treatment to manage carious vital pulp exposure in permanent posterior teeth with closed root apices.

Data/sources: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline was used. A search of articles published between 1960 January and 2015 July was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases.

Study selection: Only studies that performed full coronal pulpotomy for carious vital pulp exposure of permanent posterior teeth and had clinical and radiographic assessments during at least one-year follow-up were qualified for data analyses. The weighted mean success rate (WSR) was the primary outcome and estimated using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. Out of 299 articles, six studies were included for the analysis of one-year WSR, and five studies were included in the analysis of two-year WSR. The one-year and two-year WSR were 94% (95% confidence interval (CI): [90,99]) and 92% (CI: [84,100]) respectively. Differences in pulp capping and restoration materials did not significantly affect success rates (Two-year WSR in the MTA and MTA-like products group vs. the calcium hydroxide group: 92% (CI: [85,99]) vs. 88% (CI: [76,100]); the amalgam group vs. the composite group: 92% (CI: [81,100]) vs. 93% (CI: [81,100])).

Conclusions: Generally, full coronal pulpotomy had a favorable success rate in treating carious vital pulp exposure of permanent mature teeth with closed root apices. More studies with control group of root canal treated teeth and longer follow-up periods are needed.

Clinical significance: Coronal pulpotomy treatment can be considered as an intermediate treatment option in managing carious vital pulp exposures of permanent teeth with closed root apices. This option may also serve as a substitute to extraction when root canal treatment cannot be performed for low income and uninsured patients or in underserved areas.

Keywords: Evidence based dentistry; Public health dentistry; Pulp exposure; Pulpitis; Vital puLp.

Publication types

Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review

MeSH terms

Dental Pulp Capping / methods*
Dental Pulp Exposure / therapy*
Humans
Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents / therapeutic use
Pulpitis / therapy
Pulpotomy / methods*
Treatment Outcome

Substances

Pulp Capping and Pulpectomy Agents