Clinical Significance of Closure of Mesenteric Defects in Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Single-Institutional Cohort Study

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Feb;26(1):82-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000234.

Abstract

Background: The effect of closure of mesenteric defects to prevent complications, such as internal hernia, during laparoscopic colectomy remains controversial and is a subject of debate.

Purpose: This retrospective single-institution study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of mesenteric defect closure during a laparoscopic colectomy.

Methods: We evaluated 58 patients who underwent laparoscopic right-side colectomy or transverse colectomy. The statistical relevance of complications, surgical maneuvers, and clinical factors was examined.

Results: The mesenteric defects were closed in 30 patients and not closed in 28 patients. Two patients with ileus and 1 with a deep incisional surgical site infection required a second surgery. The reoperation rate was significantly higher in the nonclosure group than in the closure group (11% vs. 0%, respectively; P=0.033).

Consideration: Serious complications requiring reoperation occurred only in the nonclosure group. The procedure for closing the defect did not extend the operation time or increase the bleeding.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Blood Loss, Surgical / statistics & numerical data
  • Colectomy / methods*
  • Colonic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymph Node Excision
  • Male
  • Mesentery / surgery*
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Closure Techniques