Controlling Posture and Vergence Eye Movements in Quiet Stance: Effects of Thin Plantar Inserts

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 4;10(12):e0143693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143693. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess properties of vergence and saccade eye movements as well as posture in quiet stance, and the effects of thin plantar inserts upon postural and oculomotor control. The performances of 36 young healthy subjects were recorded by a force platform and an eye tracker in three testing conditions: without plantar stimulation, with a 3 millimetre-thick plantar insert, either a Medial or a Lateral Arch Support (MAS/LAS). The results showed a decrease of the Surface and Variance of Speed and a more posterior position of the CoP with either stimulation compared with the control condition. The fractal analysis showed a decrease with MAS. Wavelet analysis in the time-frequency domain revealed an increase in the Cancelling Time of the low frequency band with MAS. These results suggest a better stability for a lower energy cost. Concerning eye movements, the inserts influenced only vergence (not saccades): MAS caused an increase of the phasic amplitude of divergence, and conversely a decrease of the tonic amplitude. In contrast, LAS caused an increase of the tonic amplitude of convergence. Thus, MAS renders divergence less visually driven, while LAS renders convergence more visually driven. We conclude that the CNS uses the podal signal for both postural and vergence control via specific mechanisms. Plantar inserts have an influence upon posture and vergence movements in a different way according to the part of the foot sole being stimulated. These results can be useful to clinicians interested in foot or eye.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Eye Movements / physiology*
  • Female
  • Foot Orthoses*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postural Balance / physiology*
  • Posture / physiology*

Grants and funding

A. Foisy was financially supported by the COE (College Ostéopathique Européen, 2000€ http://www.osteo-coe.fr/), the API (Association de Posturologie Internationale, 750€ http://www.posturologie.asso.fr/API/Accueil.html) and the Institut d’Assas (250€ http://www.ecoledassas.com/). None of these sponsors played a role in any part of the study.